Reader’s Log, Supplemental

In 2024, I managed a title per day, averaging 118 pages a day. I aimed to review 10% of the number of titles I read, but managed to rview 5% of titles, about 20 reviews in the year, which is almost two a month. Not outrageously terrible.

Two dozen were re-reads, a title per week were read aloud, or were audio books, which was more than i expected even if more or less the same as every year since 2020 when I began tracking it. 

136 titles, that is 37%, were digital, and the remainder, paper.  As I mentioned before, 60% are poetry, but specifically, 5% total were haiku or tanka. A little less than I thought but I did miss the conference so picked up no new titles. It’s harder than find in the wilds. 

I flagged 28 titles as memorable. 68 I rated as 5/5 and only half a dozen I pursued to the bitter end despite feeling it as 1/5. If it’s not for me, better to quit, but stretch reads are building hooks for the future. I have qualms about rating as the cases where one poem or line or scene sent me but the rest okay or blasé. How do I even indicate that except for in my comment field?

Okay, that’s it for now. My instagram post as usual, lists particulars of titles. 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.