At Mayday [link was via Chris] Mlinko lists her senses of the requirement of contemporary poetry including these characteristics (and I paraphrase):
– words that are slanted to the heavily sensory,
– partitioning details of perception instead of holistically plotted,
– indirect telling pushed as far as possible into loose associative, obscure connections/connotations,
– harsh, intense subjective narration that is personal/stylized, anti-sensical and anti-science.
Hardly seems like a compliment.
Elegantly simple didn’t make the cut. Nor did humor. Surprising insight. Sense of inevitability. Mystic to grounded dynamic is absent. Pop culture or dissent towards political peace, not mentioned. Maybe these are universals to poetry. The distinctions can cross genres of poetry from short forms to visual to lyrical.
To say modern art is not representational isn’t to deny that it uses color.
Labels never sit well with me. Categorical statement never do either. Like the one in the sentence before this one.
